Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.
Toolkit Library/
To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring
Making connections:
Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.
Truth matters: teaching young students to search for the most reasonable answer
Article
30 minutes
By: Alina Reznitskaya and Ian A.G. Wilkinson, Phi Delta Kappan
Mapping systems
Tool
60 minutes
By: Harvard Graduate School of Education
What is critical thinking (and why should I care)?
Video
5 minutes
By: SAGE Students, Thomas Chatfield
Critical thinking for college, career, and citizenship
Article
12 minutes
By: Brookings Institute, Diane F. Halpern
K-5 Card Deck Activity: Critical thinking
Tool
30 minutes
By: Principled Innovation® (PI)