Toolkit Library/

To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring

Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.


   12 minutes

   By: Sam Wineburg, The Conversation

   Educator-prep | K-12 educators

Making connections:

Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.

More on this topic:

When problem-solving is a problem


  20 minutes

  By: Harvard Gazette

Logical fallacies


  7 minutes

  By: Mometrix Academy

Honesty playbook


  10 minutes

  By: Character Lab

Why do we believe things that aren’t true?


  16 minutes

  By: Philip Fernbach, TEDx

A framework for ethical decision-making


  15 minutes

  By: Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University

Access our collection of +200 learning materials

PI toolkit library