Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.
Toolkit Library/
To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring
Making connections:
Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.
Systems thinking: understanding the whole rather than just separate pieces
Video
3 minutes
By: Synergos
Systems thinking: a cautionary tale
Video
3 minutes
By: Sustainability Illustrated
Evaluating quality of online information
Article
20 minutes
By: Julie Cairo
Why do our brains love fake news?
Video
5 minutes
By: PBS
Visualize and build a prototype
Tool
120 minutes
By: The Learning Accelerator