Toolkit Library/

To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring

Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.


   12 minutes

   By: Sam Wineburg, The Conversation

   Educator-prep | K-12 educators

Making connections:

Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.

More on this topic:

Book excerpt: how to close the critical thinking gap for all students


  12 minutes

  By: Colin Seale

Systems thinking: a cautionary tale


  3 minutes

  By: Sustainability Illustrated

Systems thinking: understanding the whole rather than just separate pieces


  3 minutes

  By: Synergos

Evaluating quality of online information


  20 minutes

  By: Julie Cairo

Visualize and build a prototype


  120 minutes

  By: The Learning Accelerator

Access our collection of +200 learning materials

PI toolkit library