Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.
Toolkit Library/
To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring
Making connections:
Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.
Critical thinking for college, career, and citizenship
Article
12 minutes
By: Brookings Institute, Diane F. Halpern
Responding to crisis with character
Video
11 minutes
By: Principled Innovation® (PI)
5 barriers to critical thinking
Article
10 minutes
By: Chistopher Dwyer, Psychology Today
Deconstructing myths in the classroom
Article
30 minutes
By: Principled Innovation® (PI)
Ethics Centre playlist, part 2: ethical decision making
Video
4 minutes
By: Ethics Centre