Toolkit Library/

To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring

Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.

   Article

   12 minutes

   By: Sam Wineburg, The Conversation

   Educator-prep | K-12 educators


Making connections:

Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.

More on this topic:

K-5 Card Deck Activity: Truth-seeking

  Tool

  30 minutes

  By: Principled Innovation® (PI)

Ethics Centre playlist, part 3: moral intuition and ethical judgment

  Video

  4 minutes

  By: Ethics Centre

Systems thinking: a cautionary tale

  Video

  3 minutes

  By: Sustainability Illustrated

Why we believe obvious untruths

  Article

  10 minutes

  By: New York Times, Philip Fernbach and Steven Sloman

An engine for inquiry

  Article

  180 minutes

  By: ASU New College

Access our collection of +200 learning materials

PI toolkit library