Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.
Toolkit Library/
To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring
Making connections:
Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.
Mindful reflection as a process for developing culturally responsive processes
Article
20 minutes
By: Barbara Dray, Debora Wisneski
K-5 Card Deck Activity: Humility
Tool
20 minutes
By: Principled Innovation® (PI)
The real bias built in at Facebook
Article
12 minutes
By: New York Times, Zeynep Tufekci
Systems thinking: a cautionary tale
Video
3 minutes
By: Sustainability Illustrated
What’s a value or principle you live by?
Video
1 minutes
By: Ethics Centre