Understanding problems and identifying solutions requires identifying credible sources to inform that understanding. Yet an explosion in information over the past two decades has left students ill-prepared to critically assess the legitimacy of that information. In this article, Stanford professor Sam Wineburg describes his research on how students typically evaluate the sources of online information. He suggests “lateral reading” strategies used by fact checkers as one way to more critically assess what we read online.
Toolkit Library/
To navigate the dangers of the web, you need critical thinking—but you also need critical ignoring
Making connections:
Principled Innovation asks us to work with others and recognize the limits of our own knowledge so that we can better understand and tackle the complex issues our communities face.
Why we believe obvious untruths
Article
10 minutes
By: New York Times, Philip Fernbach and Steven Sloman
Unpacking the biases that shape our beliefs
Video
11 minutes
By: Mike Hartmann, TEDx
Ethics Centre playlist, part 2: ethical decision making
Video
4 minutes
By: Ethics Centre
Why do we believe things that aren’t true?
Video
16 minutes
By: Philip Fernbach, TEDx
Honesty playbook
Article
10 minutes
By: Character Lab